Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Compared models

Claude Opus 4.6 (medium) vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium) vs GPT-5.3-Codex (medium) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium) benchmark comparison: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium) leads on Score with 9.2. Claude Opus 4.6 (medium) leads on Reliability with 10.0. GPT-5.3-Codex (medium) has the lowest Total Cost at $0.920. GPT-5.3-Codex (medium) is fastest at 16.96s.

Last updated at: 2026-08-07

Rank
#60
Total Output Tokens
100,601
Response Time (avg)
34.27s
Total Cost
$3.059
Rank
#56
Total Output Tokens
115,865
Response Time (avg)
25.91s
Total Cost
$2.057
Rank
#18
Total Output Tokens
55,525
Response Time (avg)
16.96s
Total Cost
$0.920
Rank
#9
Total Output Tokens
97,958
Response Time (avg)
21.47s
Total Cost
$1.361
Recommended model GPT-5.3-Codex (medium)

Its score stays close to the best score here (8.9 vs 9.2), while costing about 2.3x less than the other models in this comparison.

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Release: 2026-02-05 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Release: 2026-02-17 GPT-5.3-Codex GPT-5.3-Codex medium Release: 2026-02-05 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Release: 2026-02-19
Score 7.7 7.8 8.9 9.2
Rank #60 #56 #18 #9
Reliability 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 9.2 8.6 10.0
Benchmark coverage 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 66.7% 83.3% 90.9%
Flaky tests 3 2 4 0
Total Runs 66 66 66 66
Cost per result 23.524 14.692 5.748 6.801
Total Cost $3.059 $2.057 $0.920 $1.361
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $3.000 / 1M $1.750 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $15.000 / 1M $14.000 / 1M $12.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,615 106,292 81,268 92,287
Output Tokens 72,286 80,748 6,251 5,232
Reasoning Tokens 28,315 35,117 49,274 92,726
Response Time (avg) 34.27s 25.91s 16.96s 21.47s
Response Time (max) 151.51s 140.96s 100.93s 88.68s
Response Time (total) 513.99s 362.78s 373.19s 322.08s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#60 Claude Opus 4.6

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#56 Claude Sonnet 4.6

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#18 GPT-5.3-Codex

medium
Cost
$0.049
Time
54.9s
Tokens
3,580 tok

#9 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

medium
Cost
$0.115
Time
87.2s
Tokens
9,629 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 5.7 7.1 44.4% 1 30.10s 8,522 13,057 4,121
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.7 6.6 44.4% 1 33.29s 6,995 16,089 3,686
GPT-5.3-Codex 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 19.50s 7,302 535 10,890
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 7.9 9.9 66.7% 0 40.17s 8,124 435 41,247

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair