Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Claude Fable 5 (medium) leads on average score with 8.6 vs 8.0. Inkling (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.006 vs $3.478. Claude Fable 5 (medium) is faster at 17.20s vs 64.16s, with pass rates of 78.8% vs 77.3%.

Recommended modelClaude Fable 5 (medium)It has the best score here (8.6), while responding about 3.7x faster than Inkling (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Fable 5 Claude Fable 5 medium Release: 2026-06-10 Inkling Inkling high Release: 2026-07-18
Score 8.6 8.0
Rank #22 #35
Reliability 10.0 9.8
Consistency 9.6 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 78.8% 77.3%
Flaky tests 1 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 20.459 6.704
Total Cost $3.478 $1.006
Input Price $10.000 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $50.000 / 1M $4.050 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 89,643 86,746
Output Tokens 41,360 6,055
Reasoning Tokens 10,269 220,791
Response Time (avg) 17.20s 64.16s
Response Time (max) 80.80s 327.51s
Response Time (total) 378.41s 1411.59s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#22 Claude Fable 5

medium
Cost
$0.606
Time
156.7s
Tokens
12,264 tok

#35 Thinking Machines: Inkling

high
Cost
$0.005
Time
32.2s
Tokens
1,275 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Fable 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.59s 10,590 7,383 1,318
Inkling 8.5 10.0 66.7% 0 148.36s 7,374 430 78,982

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair