Tool Calling Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Tool Calling, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↓.
330/330
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Tool Calling Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #278 | Laguna S 2.1 low | Poolside | 10.0 | 5.0 | $0.082 | 1/1 | 2.36s |
| #222 | GPT-5.4 Mini none | OpenAI | 3.0 | 5.9 | $0.095 | 0/1 | 2.32s |
| #257 | Inkling Small none | Thinkingmachines | 3.0 | 5.3 | $0.054 | 0/1 | 2.31s |
| #216 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.9 | $0.135 | 1/1 | 2.30s |
| #313 | MiMo-V2-Flash none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 4.0 | $0.025 | 1/1 | 2.28s |
| #265 | Granite 4.2 8B medium | IBM Granite | 10.0 | 5.2 | $0.008 | 1/1 | 2.28s |
| #178 | Mercury 2.5 Preview high | Inception | 3.0 | 6.6 | $0.030 | 0/1 | 2.25s |
| #250 | Laguna S 2.1 medium | Poolside | 10.0 | 5.4 | $0.053 | 1/1 | 2.24s |
| #269 | Granite 4.2 8B low | IBM Granite | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.012 | 1/1 | 2.23s |
| #229 | Inkling Small low | Thinkingmachines | 3.0 | 5.7 | $0.055 | 0/1 | 2.21s |
| #315 | Granite 4.1 8B none | IBM Granite | 10.0 | 4.0 | $0.007 | 1/1 | 2.17s |
| #175 | Inkling Small medium | Thinkingmachines | 3.0 | 6.6 | $0.113 | 0/1 | 2.12s |
| #233 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.247 | 1/1 | 2.04s |
| #324 | Laguna Xs.2 none | Poolside | 3.0 | 3.8 | $0.004 | 0/1 | 1.93s |
| #210 | Gemini 2.5 Flash none | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.017 | 1/1 | 1.91s |