Tool Calling Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Tool Calling, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↓.
330/330
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Tool Calling Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #254 | Kimi K2.5 none | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 5.4 | $0.101 | 1/1 | 14.0s |
| #255 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 none | DeepSeek | 9.5 | 5.4 | $0.009 | 1/1 | 4.61s |
| #256 | Laguna S 2.1 high | Poolside | 10.0 | 5.4 | $0.114 | 1/1 | 2.69s |
| #258 | Laguna XS 2.1 none | Poolside | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.008 | 1/1 | 1.36s |
| #259 | Seed-2.0-Code none | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.151 | 1/1 | 48.8s |
| #261 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 10.0 | 5.3 | $2.310 | 1/1 | 7.73s | |
| #263 | Dots 3 Note Preview none | Dots Studio | 10.0 | 5.2 | $0.000 | 1/1 | 4.04s |
| #265 | Granite 4.2 8B medium | IBM Granite | 10.0 | 5.2 | $0.008 | 1/1 | 2.28s |
| #266 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning medium | NVIDIA | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.156 | 1/1 | 4.92s |
| #267 | Mistral Small 4 none | Mistral | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.022 | 1/1 | 1.40s |
| #268 | Mistral Small 4 medium | Mistral | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.097 | 1/1 | 3.50s |
| #269 | Granite 4.2 8B low | IBM Granite | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.012 | 1/1 | 2.23s |
| #270 | Qwen3 Coder Next none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.026 | 1/1 | 2.47s |
| #271 | Mercury 2.5 low | Inception | 9.8 | 5.1 | $0.011 | 1/1 | 2.72s |
| #272 | MiMo-V2.5 none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.025 | 1/1 | 2.43s |