Tool Calling Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Tool Calling, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↓.
216/216
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Tool Calling Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #69 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite medium | 10.0 | 7.3 | $0.117 | 1/1 | 4.55s | |
| #36 | Inkling medium | Thinkingmachines | 3.0 | 8.0 | $0.391 | 0/1 | 4.48s |
| #164 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 low | Kwaipilot | 10.0 | 5.4 | $0.041 | 1/1 | 4.47s |
| #144 | Kimi K2.6 none | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 5.8 | $0.184 | 1/1 | 4.46s |
| #123 | GPT-5.6 Luna low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.249 | 1/1 | 4.43s |
| #132 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.122 | 1/1 | 4.42s |
| #153 | Mimo V2 PRO none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.6 | $0.045 | 1/1 | 4.39s |
| #210 | Qwen3.5-9B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 3.8 | $0.036 | 1/1 | 4.31s |
| #18 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.477 | 1/1 | 4.17s |
| #33 | Step 3.7 Flash medium | Stepfun | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.515 | 1/1 | 4.16s |
| #67 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.3 | $0.661 | 1/1 | 4.11s |
| #31 | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high | 10.0 | 8.1 | $0.584 | 1/1 | 4.05s | |
| #89 | Qwen3.6 Flash medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.9 | $0.738 | 1/1 | 4.00s |
| #122 | Seed-2.0-Lite none | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.066 | 1/1 | 3.94s |
| #143 | North Mini Code medium | Cohere | 10.0 | 5.9 | $0.000 | 1/1 | 3.93s |