Instructions following Model Ranking

AI BENCHY Category

See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↓.

Models Shown

Average Instructions following Score

8.0

Best Model

Failure Reasons

With failure reason Wrong answer44 With failure reason Did not follow instructions22 With failure reason API error1 With failure reason Timed out1

Rank	Model	Company	Instructions following Score	Score	Tests Correct	Response Time (avg)
#1	Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium	Google	10.0	10.0	2/2	6.10s
#2	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium	Google	10.0	9.6	2/2	9.56s
#3	Claude Opus 4.7 medium	Anthropic	10.0	9.2	2/2	1.57s
#4	Claude Opus 4.7 none	Anthropic	10.0	9.2	2/2	1.46s
#5	Gemini 3 Flash Preview low	Google	9.9	8.8	2/2	7.02s
#6	Seed-2.0-Lite medium	Bytedance Seed	10.0	8.6	2/2	7.26s
#7	GPT-5.3-Codex medium	OpenAI	10.0	8.6	2/2	3.04s
#8	Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium	Qwen	10.0	8.5	2/2	31.9s
#9	Qwen3.6 Plus Preview medium	Qwen	10.0	8.5	2/2	7.54s
#10	Qwen3.5-27B medium	Qwen	10.0	8.4	2/2	19.7s
#12	Gemini 3 PRO Preview medium	Google	9.8	8.4	2/2	3.26s
#13	GLM 5 medium	Z.ai	10.0	8.4	2/2	7.25s
#14	Gemma 4 31B medium	Google	10.0	8.3	2/2	12.8s
#15	Gemini 2.5 Flash medium	Google	9.8	8.2	2/2	2.62s
#16	GPT-5.4 medium	OpenAI	10.0	8.2	2/2	3.11s

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

→

Instructions following Ranking