Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↓.
220/220
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #210 | MiMo-V2-Flash none | Xiaomi | 6.5 | 4.0 | $0.025 | 1/2 | 857ms |
| #174 | Qwen3 Coder Next none | Qwen | 6.3 | 5.1 | $0.025 | 1/2 | 7.78s |
| #200 | Laguna S 2.1 none | Poolside | 4.3 | 4.5 | $0.025 | 0/2 | 566ms |
| #173 | Mistral Small 4 none | Mistral | 6.5 | 5.1 | $0.022 | 1/2 | 380ms |
| #163 | Mimo V2 Omni none | Xiaomi | 6.5 | 5.5 | $0.021 | 1/2 | 4.26s |
| #177 | Qwen3.5-9B none | Qwen | 6.5 | 5.1 | $0.021 | 1/2 | 514ms |
| #121 | Gemma 4 31B none | 6.5 | 6.2 | $0.021 | 1/2 | 2.84s | |
| #219 | Step 3.5 Flash none | Stepfun | 5.0 | 2.3 | $0.020 | 1/1 | 9.30s |
| #127 | gpt-oss-120b medium | OpenAI | 9.9 | 6.1 | $0.019 | 2/2 | 7.63s |
| #106 | Hy3 preview medium | Tencent | 10.0 | 6.5 | $0.018 | 2/2 | 6.16s |
| #124 | Gemini 2.5 Flash none | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.017 | 2/2 | 590ms | |
| #185 | GLM 4.7 Flash none | Z.ai | 6.5 | 4.9 | $0.016 | 1/2 | 888ms |
| #170 | Ling-2.6-1T none | Inclusionai | 6.4 | 5.3 | $0.016 | 1/2 | 5.36s |
| #208 | Laguna Xs.2 medium | Poolside | 10.0 | 4.1 | $0.015 | 2/2 | 1.68s |
| #159 | Hy3 preview low | Tencent | 10.0 | 5.5 | $0.015 | 2/2 | 16.0s |