AI BENCHY Category
Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↓.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #153 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B none | Qwen | 6.2 | 4.6 | 1/2 | 1.86s |
| #154 | Qwen3.5-9B none | Qwen | 6.5 | 4.6 | 1/2 | 514ms |
| #155 | Mercury 2 none | Inception | 6.5 | 4.5 | 1/2 | 551ms |
| #156 | Hy3 preview none | Tencent | 6.3 | 4.4 | 1/2 | 13.0s |
| #158 | GLM 4.7 Flash medium | Z.ai | 6.2 | 4.4 | 1/2 | 2.97s |
| #159 | Ling-2.6-1T none | Inclusionai | 6.4 | 4.3 | 1/2 | 5.36s |
| #160 | LFM2-24B-A2B none | Liquid | 6.3 | 4.2 | 1/2 | 752ms |
| #161 | Qwen3.5-9B medium | Qwen | 6.5 | 4.2 | 1/2 | 5.75s |
| #130 | MiniMax M2.7 medium | Minimax | 3.8 | 5.3 | 0/2 | 12.8s |
| #151 | Trinity Large Preview none | Arcee AI | 3.5 | 4.6 | 0/2 | 822ms |
| #157 | Grok 4.1 Fast none | X AI | 3.0 | 4.4 | 0/2 | 685ms |
| #162 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30b A3b Reasoning none | NVIDIA | 4.8 | 4.1 | 0/2 | 541ms |
| #163 | Granite 4.1 8B none | IBM Granite | 3.6 | 4.0 | 0/2 | 344ms |