Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Score ↑.
316/316
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #316 | LFM2-24B-A2B none | Liquid | 6.3 | 2.2 | $0.001 | 1/2 | 752ms |
| #315 | Step 3.5 Flash none | Stepfun | 5.0 | 2.3 | $0.020 | 1/1 | 9.30s |
| #314 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30b A3b Reasoning none | NVIDIA | 4.8 | 3.2 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 541ms |
| #313 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30b A3b Reasoning medium | NVIDIA | 7.3 | 3.4 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 1.37s |
| #312 | gpt-oss-120b none | OpenAI | 9.8 | 3.7 | $0.010 | 2/2 | 5.06s |
| #311 | Laguna Xs.2 none | Poolside | 6.5 | 3.8 | $0.004 | 1/2 | 439ms |
| #310 | Ling 3.0 Tiny medium | Inclusionai | 6.8 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 3.00s |
| #309 | Qwen3.5-9B medium | Qwen | 6.5 | 3.8 | $0.062 | 1/2 | 5.75s |
| #308 | Grok 4.1 Fast none | X AI | 3.0 | 3.8 | $0.008 | 0/2 | 685ms |
| #307 | Ling 3.0 Tiny low | Inclusionai | 6.6 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 3.09s |
| #306 | Ling 3.0 Tiny high | Inclusionai | 6.8 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 3.10s |
| #305 | Grok Build 0.1 none | X AI | 9.8 | 4.0 | $0.547 | 2/2 | 7.36s |
| #304 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning none | NVIDIA | 6.5 | 4.0 | $0.007 | 1/2 | 511ms |
| #303 | Granite 4.1 8B none | IBM Granite | 3.6 | 4.0 | $0.007 | 0/2 | 344ms |
| #302 | Ling 3.0 Tiny none | Inclusionai | 3.1 | 4.0 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 2.44s |