Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Metric ↑.
216/216
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #150 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high | Kwaipilot | 9.8 | 5.6 | $0.077 | 2/2 | 1.51s |
| #164 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 low | Kwaipilot | 9.8 | 5.4 | $0.041 | 2/2 | 1.64s |
| #184 | Ling-2.6-flash none | Inclusionai | 9.8 | 4.9 | $0.002 | 2/2 | 5.52s |
| #194 | Cobuddy medium | Baidu | 9.8 | 4.7 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 11.6s |
| #199 | Elephant Alpha none | Openrouter | 9.8 | 4.3 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 1.03s |
| #201 | Elephant Alpha medium | Openrouter | 9.8 | 4.3 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 987ms |
| #1 | Gemini 3.6 Flash medium | 9.9 | 9.9 | $0.831 | 2/2 | 2.77s | |
| #2 | Gemini 3.6 Flash high | 9.9 | 9.7 | $1.785 | 2/2 | 3.94s | |
| #9 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 9.9 | 9.3 | $1.253 | 2/2 | 3.74s |
| #12 | Gemini 3.5 Flash medium | 9.9 | 9.1 | $0.642 | 2/2 | 2.70s | |
| #14 | Gemini 3.5 Flash low | 9.9 | 8.9 | $0.433 | 2/2 | 1.86s | |
| #24 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 9.9 | 8.4 | $0.951 | 2/2 | 3.12s |
| #26 | Claude Sonnet 5 medium | Anthropic | 9.9 | 8.3 | $0.922 | 2/2 | 3.10s |
| #42 | GLM 5.2 medium | Z.ai | 9.9 | 7.8 | $0.187 | 2/2 | 7.90s |
| #48 | GPT-5.6 Luna high | OpenAI | 9.9 | 7.7 | $1.017 | 2/2 | 1.79s |