Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↑.
216/216
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #49 | DeepSeek V4 Flash high | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 7.7 | $0.041 | 2/2 | 15.4s |
| #147 | GLM 5 none | Z.ai | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.041 | 2/2 | 1.48s |
| #186 | GPT-5.4 Nano none | OpenAI | 6.3 | 4.8 | $0.041 | 1/2 | 784ms |
| #164 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 low | Kwaipilot | 9.8 | 5.4 | $0.041 | 2/2 | 1.64s |
| #156 | DeepSeek V4 Flash none | DeepSeek | 6.5 | 5.6 | $0.042 | 1/2 | 17.5s |
| #119 | MiMo-V2-Flash medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 6.3 | $0.043 | 2/2 | 4.28s |
| #117 | LongCat 2.0 none | Meituan | 6.5 | 6.3 | $0.044 | 1/2 | 2.82s |
| #153 | Mimo V2 PRO none | Xiaomi | 6.5 | 5.6 | $0.045 | 1/2 | 2.51s |
| #128 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.046 | 2/2 | 859ms | |
| #176 | GLM 5 Turbo none | Z.ai | 6.5 | 5.1 | $0.047 | 1/2 | 2.13s |
| #126 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.047 | 2/2 | 932ms | |
| #141 | Hy3 preview high | Tencent | 10.0 | 5.9 | $0.048 | 2/2 | 34.4s |
| #155 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 medium | Kwaipilot | 10.0 | 5.6 | $0.048 | 2/2 | 1.50s |
| #151 | GLM 5V Turbo none | Z.ai | 6.5 | 5.6 | $0.052 | 1/2 | 1.97s |
| #112 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.052 | 2/2 | 1.13s |