Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↑.
461/461
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #165 | Grok 4.7 low | X AI | 0.8 | 0.7 | $1.933 | 1/2 | 6.19s |
| #60 | Muse Spark 1.2 high | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.018 | 2/2 | 5.43s |
| #76 | Seed 2.1 Turbo medium | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.042 | 2/2 | 7.48s |
| #384 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite high | 0.7 | 0.5 | $2.044 | 1/2 | 23.3s | |
| #50 | Muse Spark Open xhigh | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.081 | 2/2 | 23.5s |
| #251 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.6 | $2.126 | 2/2 | 2.61s |
| #28 | Claude Opus 5.5 high | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.133 | 2/2 | 21.3s |
| #14 | GPT-6 Astra low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $2.160 | 2/2 | 2.65s |
| #27 | GPT-6.1 Terra max | OpenAI | 0.9 | 0.9 | $2.209 | 1/2 | 4.20s |
| #67 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.213 | 2/2 | 3.11s |
| #139 | Grok 4.6 medium | X AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.270 | 2/2 | 12.8s |
| #401 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 1.0 | 0.4 | $2.310 | 2/2 | 64.0s | |
| #209 | Claude Opus 4.8 none | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.7 | $2.334 | 2/2 | 1.37s |
| #56 | Claude Opus 5 low | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.350 | 2/2 | 4.13s |
| #205 | Ember-1 high | Fireworks | 0.7 | 0.7 | $2.405 | 1/2 | 33.4s |