Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
461/461
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #417 | Ling 3.0 Tiny high | Inclusionai | 0.7 | 0.4 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 3.10s |
| #11 | GPT-6.1 Sol medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $0.530 | 2/2 | 3.11s |
| #67 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.213 | 2/2 | 3.11s |
| #73 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.558 | 2/2 | 3.12s |
| #100 | Claude Haiku 5.5 high | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.088 | 2/2 | 3.19s |
| #368 | Gemini 3 PRO Preview medium | 1.0 | 0.5 | $0.385 | 2/2 | 3.26s | |
| #104 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.8 | $3.490 | 2/2 | 3.32s |
| #44 | Claude Haiku 5.5 xhigh | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.140 | 2/2 | 3.34s |
| #101 | Gemini 3.5 Flash high | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.737 | 2/2 | 3.35s | |
| #350 | Mimo V2 PRO medium | Xiaomi | 1.0 | 0.5 | $0.333 | 2/2 | 3.36s |
| #38 | GPT-5.5 medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $4.809 | 2/2 | 3.36s |
| #282 | Gemini 3.5 Flash none | 1.0 | 0.6 | $1.752 | 2/2 | 3.38s | |
| #242 | GLM 5.3 low | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.215 | 2/2 | 3.40s |
| #407 | Qwen3.6 Plus Preview medium | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.4 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 3.40s |
| #40 | Qwen3.8 MAX medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.181 | 2/2 | 3.49s |