AI BENCHY
Compare Charts Methodology
❤️ Made by XCS
Your ad here

AI BENCHY Category

Domain specific Ranking

See which AI models perform best on Domain specific, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.

Models Shown

55

Average Domain specific Score

6.4

Rank Model Company Domain specific Score Avg Score Tests Correct Response Time (avg)
#11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 7.7 0/3 0ms
#14 GLM 5 medium Z.ai 10.0 7.4 0/3 0ms
#23 Seed-2.0-Mini medium Bytedance Seed 10.0 6.9 0/3 0ms
#55 LFM2-24B-A2B none Liquid 4.0 2.6 1/3 287ms
#40 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Qwen 4.0 5.0 1/3 465ms
#42 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Qwen 7.0 4.7 2/3 485ms
#38 Gemini 2.5 Flash none Google 4.0 5.2 1/3 495ms
#51 Mercury 2 none Inception 4.0 3.4 1/3 534ms
#41 Qwen3.5-27B none Qwen 10.0 4.9 0/3 540ms
#54 MiMo-V2-Flash none Xiaomi 4.0 2.9 1/3 564ms
#47 GPT-4o-mini none OpenAI 10.0 4.0 0/3 637ms
#50 Qwen3 Coder Next medium Qwen 4.0 3.5 1/3 638ms
#49 GLM 4.7 Flash none Z.ai 7.0 3.9 2/3 744ms
#45 Trinity Large Preview none Arcee AI 4.0 4.2 1/3 877ms
#37 Qwen3.5-Flash none Qwen 7.0 5.2 2/3 905ms
#22 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Google 4.0 7.1 1/3 942ms
#48 Qwen3 Coder Next none Qwen 4.0 4.0 1/3 962ms
#20 Gemini 3 Flash Preview none Google 7.0 7.2 2/3 963ms
#53 Grok 4.1 Fast none X AI 4.0 2.9 1/3 1.06s
#44 GPT-5.4 none OpenAI 4.0 4.5 1/3 1.07s
#29 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Qwen 4.0 6.2 1/3 1.17s
#33 DeepSeek V3.2 none DeepSeek 10.0 5.5 0/3 1.61s
#31 GLM 5 none Z.ai 10.0 6.0 0/3 2.24s
#17 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Google 4.0 7.3 1/3 2.36s
#25 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Anthropic 7.0 6.8 2/3 3.54s
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Google 10.0 7.5 0/3 4.21s
#46 Kimi K2.5 none Moonshot AI 4.0 4.1 1/3 4.38s
#36 Mercury 2 medium Inception 10.0 5.3 0/3 6.48s
#6 Gemini 3 Pro Preview medium Google 4.0 8.2 1/3 7.01s
#5 Gemini 3 Flash Preview low Google 4.0 8.2 1/3 8.05s
#19 GPT-5.3 Chat none OpenAI 10.0 7.3 0/3 13.0s
#4 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Qwen 4.0 8.3 1/3 17.5s
#15 GPT-5.2 Chat none OpenAI 4.0 7.4 1/3 17.8s
#1 Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium Google 10.0 10.0 3/3 21.1s
#2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Google 7.0 9.4 2/3 32.7s
#16 Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Google 4.0 7.4 1/3 37.3s
#18 DeepSeek V3.2 medium DeepSeek 4.0 7.3 1/3 39.3s
#32 GPT-5 Mini medium OpenAI 10.0 6.0 0/3 44.6s
#39 gpt-oss-120b medium OpenAI 10.0 5.1 0/3 50.9s
#10 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Qwen 10.0 7.7 0/3 63.4s
#3 GPT-5.3-Codex medium OpenAI 4.0 8.4 1/3 64.3s
#9 GPT-5.4 medium OpenAI 4.0 8.0 1/3 74.3s
#27 GPT-5.2 medium OpenAI 4.0 6.5 1/3 77.8s
#7 Qwen3.5-27B medium Qwen 4.0 8.2 1/3 79.5s
#26 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 6.6 0/3 83.4s
#35 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Qwen 10.0 5.5 0/3 88.3s
#21 MiMo-V2-Flash medium Xiaomi 4.0 7.2 1/3 96.0s
#30 Grok 4.1 Fast medium X AI 4.0 6.2 1/3 121.8s
#8 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high Google 4.0 8.2 1/3 127.6s
#28 Kimi K2.5 medium Moonshot AI 10.0 6.4 0/3 137.3s
#24 Qwen3.5-Flash medium Qwen 4.0 6.9 1/3 146.5s
#13 Step 3.5 Flash medium Stepfun 4.0 7.4 1/3 170.5s
#52 GLM 4.7 Flash medium Z.ai 10.0 3.1 0/3 174.6s
#34 GPT-5 Nano medium OpenAI 4.0 5.5 1/3 204.0s
#43 MiniMax M2.5 medium Minimax 10.0 4.7 0/3 237.3s

Top Models by Domain specific Score

Domain specific Score vs Total Cost

Top Models by Response Time (avg)