Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
328/328
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #191 | MiMo-V2-Flash medium | Xiaomi | 6.5 | 6.3 | $0.043 | 1/2 | 0ms |
| #327 | Step 3.5 Flash none | Stepfun | 1.5 | 2.3 | $0.020 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #309 | Grok 4.20 none | X AI | 10.0 | 4.1 | $0.057 | 2/2 | 522ms |
| #301 | Laguna S 2.1 none | Poolside | 10.0 | 4.5 | $0.022 | 2/2 | 537ms |
| #314 | Granite 4.1 8B none | IBM Granite | 3.0 | 4.0 | $0.007 | 0/2 | 575ms |
| #302 | Grok 4.20 Beta none | X AI | 10.0 | 4.4 | $0.087 | 2/2 | 601ms |
| #315 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning none | NVIDIA | 6.5 | 4.0 | $0.007 | 1/2 | 633ms |
| #323 | Laguna Xs.2 none | Poolside | 10.0 | 3.8 | $0.004 | 2/2 | 646ms |
| #209 | Gemini 2.5 Flash none | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.017 | 2/2 | 652ms | |
| #297 | Mercury 2 none | Inception | 7.3 | 4.7 | $0.030 | 1/2 | 667ms |
| #328 | LFM2-24B-A2B none | Liquid | 3.0 | 2.2 | $0.001 | 0/2 | 714ms |
| #251 | GPT-5.6 Luna none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 5.4 | $0.029 | 2/2 | 758ms |
| #257 | Laguna XS 2.1 none | Poolside | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.008 | 2/2 | 768ms |
| #256 | Inkling Small none | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.054 | 2/2 | 782ms |
| #266 | Mistral Small 4 none | Mistral | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.022 | 2/2 | 822ms |