Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↓.
359/359
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #97 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite medium | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.272 | 2/2 | 2.11s | |
| #98 | GLM 5.2 medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.151 | 2/2 | 13.4s |
| #99 | GPT-5.6 Terra medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.523 | 2/2 | 872ms |
| #100 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.8 | $2.126 | 2/2 | 13.9s |
| #102 | Seed-2.0-Lite medium | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.236 | 2/2 | 9.07s |
| #104 | Qwen3.7 Flash high | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.052 | 2/2 | 20.1s |
| #106 | Seed-2.0-Code low | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 7.7 | $0.767 | 2/2 | 24.9s |
| #107 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.7 | $2.961 | 2/2 | 7.37s |
| #108 | DeepSeek V4 Pro high | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 7.7 | $0.454 | 2/2 | 25.0s |
| #109 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 high | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 7.6 | $0.042 | 2/2 | 28.0s |
| #110 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash low | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 7.6 | $0.174 | 2/2 | 1.51s |
| #111 | GLM 5 Turbo medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 7.6 | $0.323 | 2/2 | 6.19s |
| #112 | GPT-5.6 Luna high | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.6 | $0.179 | 2/2 | 2.18s |
| #113 | Solar Pro 4 xhigh | Upstage | 10.0 | 7.6 | $0.150 | 2/2 | 48.4s |
| #114 | Nemotron 3 Ultra medium | NVIDIA | 10.0 | 7.6 | $0.567 | 2/2 | 5.68s |