Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↓.
359/359
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #81 | Grok 4.7 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.1 | $2.254 | 2/2 | 5.16s |
| #82 | Inkling high | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 8.0 | $1.046 | 2/2 | 8.19s |
| #83 | Muse Spark 1.1 high | Meta | 10.0 | 8.0 | $2.253 | 2/2 | 8.40s |
| #84 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 low | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.138 | 2/2 | 4.35s |
| #85 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 high | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.279 | 2/2 | 3.65s |
| #86 | GLM 5.2 high | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.799 | 2/2 | 5.81s |
| #87 | Inkling medium | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.383 | 2/2 | 3.60s |
| #88 | GPT-5.6 Terra high | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.836 | 2/2 | 938ms |
| #89 | Grok 4.7 low | X AI | 10.0 | 7.9 | $1.320 | 2/2 | 4.88s |
| #91 | GPT-5.2 Chat none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.9 | $0.594 | 2/2 | 3.05s |
| #92 | Step 3.7 Flash medium | Stepfun | 10.0 | 7.9 | $0.495 | 2/2 | 2.75s |
| #93 | Qwen3.8 27B low | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.9 | ~$0.071 | 2/2 | 8.03s |
| #94 | GPT-6 Luna medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.9 | $0.031 | 2/2 | 26.1s |
| #95 | Qwen3.7 Plus medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.9 | $0.277 | 2/2 | 21.7s |
| #96 | Qwen3.6 Plus medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.418 | 2/2 | 14.9s |