Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↓.
Models Shown
15
Average Data parsing and extraction Score
8.8
Best Model
Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Beta 10.0
316/316
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #146 | Step 3.7 Flash high | Stepfun | 10.0 | 6.8 | $1.229 | 2/2 | 14.7s |
| #127 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.1 | $1.207 | 2/2 | 23.4s |
| #68 | GLM 5.2 high | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.0 | $1.188 | 2/2 | 5.81s |
| #52 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.182 | 2/2 | 3.15s |
| #120 | Claude Opus 4.8 none | Anthropic | 7.3 | 7.3 | $1.166 | 1/2 | 1.77s |
| #24 | Qwen3.7 Max medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 9.1 | $1.157 | 2/2 | 8.80s |
| #147 | Seed-2.0-Code medium | Bytedance Seed | 7.3 | 6.8 | $1.153 | 1/2 | 18.8s |
| #45 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.132 | 2/2 | 41.2s |
| #103 | Grok Build 0.1 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 7.5 | $1.130 | 2/2 | 10.7s |
| #37 | Claude Opus 5 low | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.121 | 2/2 | 3.69s |
| #144 | Gemini 3.5 Flash none | 6.5 | 6.9 | $1.093 | 1/2 | 8.10s | |
| #64 | Inkling high | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 8.0 | $1.046 | 2/2 | 8.19s |
| #30 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.9 | $0.988 | 2/2 | 3.07s |
| #100 | Qwen3.5-27B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.982 | 2/2 | 30.3s |
| #51 | Grok 4.5 low | X AI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.945 | 2/2 | 3.44s |