Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↓.
343/343
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #285 | MiMo-V2.5 none | Xiaomi | 6.5 | 5.1 | $0.025 | 1/2 | 1.01s |
| #245 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.247 | 2/2 | 1.01s |
| #320 | Elephant Alpha medium | Openrouter | 6.5 | 4.3 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 979ms |
| #334 | Grok 4.1 Fast none | X AI | 10.0 | 3.8 | $0.008 | 2/2 | 943ms |
| #81 | GPT-5.6 Terra high | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.836 | 2/2 | 938ms |
| #110 | GPT-5.6 Terra low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.420 | 2/2 | 919ms |
| #331 | Mercury 2.5 none | Inception | 2.8 | 3.9 | $0.016 | 0/2 | 885ms |
| #91 | GPT-5.6 Terra medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.523 | 2/2 | 872ms |
| #181 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite low | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.138 | 2/2 | 859ms | |
| #286 | Qwen3.5-9B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.021 | 2/2 | 847ms |
| #213 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.046 | 2/2 | 843ms | |
| #280 | Mistral Small 4 none | Mistral | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.022 | 2/2 | 822ms |
| #341 | Jev 1.13 none | Typesafe | 10.0 | 3.2 | $0.003 | 2/2 | 799ms |
| #270 | Inkling Small none | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.054 | 2/2 | 782ms |
| #271 | Laguna XS 2.1 none | Poolside | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.008 | 2/2 | 768ms |