Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↓.
343/343
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #277 | Inkling none | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 5.2 | $0.147 | 2/2 | 1.14s |
| #327 | Ling 3.0 Tiny none | Inclusionai | 6.3 | 4.0 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 1.14s |
| #224 | GPT-5.6 Terra none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.280 | 2/2 | 1.13s |
| #290 | Mercury 2.5 Preview low | Inception | 6.3 | 5.0 | $0.011 | 1/2 | 1.12s |
| #301 | GPT-5.4 Nano none | OpenAI | 6.5 | 4.8 | $0.041 | 1/2 | 1.11s |
| #153 | Mercury 2 medium | Inception | 7.3 | 7.0 | $0.094 | 1/2 | 1.11s |
| #242 | Ling-3.0-flash none | Inclusionai | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.004 | 2/2 | 1.10s |
| #243 | GLM 5.1 none | Z.ai | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.164 | 2/2 | 1.08s |
| #284 | Mercury 2.5 low | Inception | 6.5 | 5.1 | $0.011 | 1/2 | 1.06s |
| #204 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.122 | 2/2 | 1.05s |
| #321 | Granite 4.2 8B none | IBM Granite | 2.9 | 4.3 | $0.037 | 0/2 | 1.05s |
| #295 | Mercury 2.5 Preview none | Inception | 6.3 | 4.9 | $0.018 | 1/2 | 1.04s |
| #318 | Elephant Alpha none | Openrouter | 6.5 | 4.3 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 1.04s |
| #236 | GPT-5.4 none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 5.8 | $0.397 | 2/2 | 1.04s |
| #209 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.047 | 2/2 | 1.04s |