AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Category

Data parsing and extraction Ranking

See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↓.

Models Shown

15

Average Data parsing and extraction Score

8.7

Rank Model Company Data parsing and extraction Score Score Tests Correct Response Time (avg)
#18 Qwen3.7 Plus medium Qwen 10.0 8.2 2/2 21.7s
#19 Seed-2.0-Lite medium Bytedance Seed 10.0 8.2 2/2 9.07s
#21 GPT-5.4 medium OpenAI 10.0 8.0 2/2 5.32s
#22 Step 3.7 Flash medium Stepfun 10.0 8.0 2/2 2.75s
#23 GLM 5 Turbo medium Z.ai 10.0 8.0 2/2 6.19s
#24 GPT-5.2 Chat none OpenAI 10.0 7.9 2/2 3.05s
#25 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Qwen 10.0 7.9 2/2 46.9s
#26 Qwen3.6 Plus medium Qwen 10.0 7.9 2/2 14.9s
#27 Gemma 4 31B medium Google 10.0 7.8 2/2 21.1s
#28 Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Google 10.0 7.8 2/2 4.06s
#29 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Qwen 10.0 7.8 2/2 23.4s
#30 Qwen3.5-27B medium Qwen 10.0 7.8 2/2 30.3s
#31 DeepSeek V4 Flash high DeepSeek 10.0 7.7 2/2 28.0s
#32 Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal Google 10.0 7.7 2/2 1.66s
#34 Qwen3.7 Max none Qwen 10.0 7.7 2/2 1.35s

Top Models by Data parsing and extraction Score

Data parsing and extraction Score vs Total Cost

Top Models by Response Time (avg)