Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↓.
Models Shown
15
Average Data parsing and extraction Score
8.8
Best Model
Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Beta 10.0
311/311
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #285 | Laguna S 2.1 none | Poolside | 10.0 | 4.5 | $0.022 | 2/2 | 537ms |
| #251 | Mistral Small 4 none | Mistral | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.022 | 2/2 | 822ms |
| #232 | Mimo V2 Omni none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.5 | $0.021 | 2/2 | 1.76s |
| #174 | Ling-3.0-flash high | Inclusionai | 7.3 | 6.4 | $0.021 | 1/2 | 7.15s |
| #256 | Qwen3.5-9B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.021 | 2/2 | 847ms |
| #310 | Step 3.5 Flash none | Stepfun | 1.5 | 2.3 | $0.020 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #184 | gpt-oss-120b medium | OpenAI | 6.4 | 6.1 | $0.020 | 1/2 | 1.98s |
| #185 | Qwen3.7 Flash none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.019 | 2/2 | 2.09s |
| #265 | Mercury 2.5 Preview none | Inception | 6.3 | 4.9 | $0.018 | 1/2 | 1.04s |
| #195 | Gemini 2.5 Flash none | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.017 | 2/2 | 652ms | |
| #191 | Gemma 4 31B none | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.016 | 2/2 | 2.25s | |
| #275 | GLM 4.7 Flash none | Z.ai | 7.3 | 4.8 | $0.016 | 1/2 | 4.82s |
| #244 | Ling-2.6-1T none | Inclusionai | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.016 | 2/2 | 1.37s |
| #294 | Laguna Xs.2 medium | Poolside | 7.1 | 4.1 | $0.015 | 1/2 | 9.34s |
| #206 | GLM 5.3 Flash low | Z.ai | 6.5 | 5.9 | $0.015 | 1/2 | 2.39s |