Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↓.
311/311
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #170 | Dots 3 Note Preview low | Dots Studio | 7.3 | 6.4 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 11.5s |
| #171 | Dots 3 Note Preview high | Dots Studio | 7.3 | 6.4 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 12.7s |
| #174 | Ling-3.0-flash high | Inclusionai | 7.3 | 6.4 | $0.021 | 1/2 | 7.15s |
| #175 | Ring-2.6-1T medium | Inclusionai | 6.5 | 6.4 | $0.102 | 1/2 | 37.4s |
| #176 | Mimo V2 PRO medium | Xiaomi | 7.3 | 6.3 | $0.333 | 1/2 | 17.2s |
| #177 | MiMo-V2-Flash medium | Xiaomi | 6.5 | 6.3 | $0.043 | 1/2 | 0ms |
| #183 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium | Qwen | 7.3 | 6.1 | $1.140 | 1/2 | 59.3s |
| #184 | gpt-oss-120b medium | OpenAI | 6.4 | 6.1 | $0.020 | 1/2 | 1.98s |
| #187 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 7.3 | 6.1 | $0.142 | 1/2 | 57.0s |
| #189 | Trinity Large Thinking medium | Arcee AI | 6.3 | 6.1 | $0.756 | 1/2 | 16.4s |
| #194 | Trinity Large Thinking low | Arcee AI | 7.3 | 6.0 | $0.625 | 1/2 | 14.3s |
| #205 | Hy3 preview high | Tencent | 6.5 | 5.9 | $0.135 | 1/2 | 12.1s |
| #206 | GLM 5.3 Flash low | Z.ai | 6.5 | 5.9 | $0.015 | 1/2 | 2.39s |
| #208 | Seed 2.1 Turbo none | Bytedance Seed | 7.1 | 5.9 | $0.092 | 1/2 | 2.63s |
| #220 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high | Kwaipilot | 6.5 | 5.6 | $0.077 | 1/2 | 3.59s |