Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↓.
343/343
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #34 | Pareto none | Unbiased | 10.0 | 8.9 | $1.172 | 2/2 | 2.57s |
| #171 | Mercury 2.5 medium | Inception | 10.0 | 6.8 | $0.022 | 2/2 | 2.57s |
| #109 | GPT-5.4 Nano medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.142 | 2/2 | 2.54s |
| #287 | GLM 5 Turbo none | Z.ai | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.047 | 2/2 | 2.47s |
| #117 | GPT-5.4 Mini medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.786 | 2/2 | 2.43s |
| #263 | Laguna S 2.1 medium | Poolside | 10.0 | 5.4 | $0.053 | 2/2 | 2.42s |
| #233 | GLM 5.3 Flash low | Z.ai | 6.5 | 5.9 | $0.030 | 1/2 | 2.39s |
| #268 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 none | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 5.4 | $0.021 | 2/2 | 2.37s |
| #44 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.476 | 2/2 | 2.37s |
| #197 | LongCat 2.0 none | Meituan | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.044 | 2/2 | 2.36s |
| #119 | Gemini 3.8 Flash low | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.239 | 2/2 | 2.34s | |
| #4 | GPT-6 Astra high | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.9 | $3.474 | 2/2 | 2.32s |
| #120 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.117 | 2/2 | 2.29s | |
| #145 | Step 3.7 Flash low | Stepfun | 7.3 | 7.1 | $0.390 | 1/2 | 2.29s |
| #95 | Claude Opus 4.8 low | Anthropic | 6.3 | 7.8 | $2.089 | 1/2 | 2.27s |