Data parsing and extraction Model Ranking

See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↓.

Models Shown

Average Data parsing and extraction Score

8.9

Best Model

Qwen3.5-9B 3.6

Failure Reasons

With failure reason Wrong answer41 With failure reason API error14 With failure reason No answer8 With failure reason Extra formatting6 With failure reason Timed out1

216/216

Rank	Model	Company	Data parsing and extraction Score	Score	Total Cost	Tests Correct	Response Time (avg)
#211	Laguna Xs.2 none	Poolside	10.0	3.8	$0.004	2/2	646ms
Total Tests 2 Wrong Tests 0 Total Cost $0.004 Response Time (avg) 646ms
#197	Grok 4.20 Beta none	X AI	10.0	4.4	$0.087	2/2	601ms
Total Tests 2 Wrong Tests 0 Total Cost $0.087 Response Time (avg) 601ms
#207	Granite 4.1 8B none	IBM Granite	3.0	4.0	$0.007	0/2	575ms
Total Tests 2 Wrong Tests 2 Total Cost $0.007 Response Time (avg) 575ms
#203	Grok 4.20 none	X AI	10.0	4.1	$0.057	2/2	522ms
Total Tests 2 Wrong Tests 0 Total Cost $0.057 Response Time (avg) 522ms
#119	MiMo-V2-Flash medium	Xiaomi	6.5	6.3	$0.043	1/2	0ms
Total Tests 2 Wrong Tests 1 Total Cost $0.043 Response Time (avg) 0ms
#215	Step 3.5 Flash none	Stepfun	1.5	2.3	$0.020	0/1	0ms
Total Tests 1 Wrong Tests 1 Total Cost $0.020 Response Time (avg) 0ms

Data parsing and extraction Ranking

Filter models

Top Models by Data parsing and extraction Score

Data parsing and extraction Score vs Total Cost

Top Models by Response Time (avg)