AI BENCHY Category
Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↓.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #157 | Grok 4.1 Fast none | X AI | 10.0 | 4.4 | 2/2 | 943ms |
| #154 | Qwen3.5-9B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 4.6 | 2/2 | 847ms |
| #90 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none | 10.0 | 6.4 | 2/2 | 843ms | |
| #142 | Mistral Small 4 none | Mistral | 10.0 | 4.9 | 2/2 | 822ms |
| #160 | LFM2-24B-A2B none | Liquid | 3.0 | 4.2 | 0/2 | 714ms |
| #155 | Mercury 2 none | Inception | 7.3 | 4.5 | 1/2 | 667ms |
| #97 | Gemini 2.5 Flash none | 10.0 | 6.2 | 2/2 | 652ms | |
| #146 | Laguna Xs.2 none | Poolside | 10.0 | 4.8 | 2/2 | 646ms |
| #106 | Grok 4.20 Beta none | X AI | 10.0 | 5.8 | 2/2 | 601ms |
| #163 | Granite 4.1 8B none | IBM Granite | 3.0 | 4.0 | 0/2 | 575ms |
| #127 | Grok 4.20 none | X AI | 10.0 | 5.4 | 2/2 | 522ms |
| #64 | MiMo-V2-Flash medium | Xiaomi | 6.5 | 7.2 | 1/2 | 0ms |
| #83 | Step 3.5 Flash none | Stepfun | 3.0 | 6.6 | 0/1 | 0ms |