Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↓.
343/343
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #82 | Grok 4.7 low | X AI | 10.0 | 7.9 | $1.320 | 2/2 | 4.88s |
| #305 | GLM 4.7 Flash none | Z.ai | 7.3 | 4.8 | $0.016 | 1/2 | 4.82s |
| #333 | Ling 3.0 Tiny low | Inclusionai | 2.8 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 4.82s |
| #3 | GPT-6 Astra max | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.9 | $3.803 | 2/2 | 4.78s |
| #158 | Claude Fable 5.1 low | Anthropic | 10.0 | 6.9 | $2.565 | 2/2 | 4.71s |
| #157 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 medium | Kwaipilot | 7.3 | 6.9 | $0.478 | 1/2 | 4.70s |
| #168 | DeepSeek V4 Pro none | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 6.8 | $0.196 | 2/2 | 4.61s |
| #65 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash max | DeepSeek | 6.5 | 8.3 | $0.537 | 1/2 | 4.56s |
| #272 | Seed-2.0-Code none | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.151 | 2/2 | 4.53s |
| #190 | Laguna XS 2.1 medium | Poolside | 10.0 | 6.5 | $0.068 | 2/2 | 4.50s |
| #246 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite high | 10.0 | 5.6 | $2.044 | 2/2 | 4.49s | |
| #67 | Claude Fable 5.1 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.3 | $2.909 | 2/2 | 4.47s |
| #336 | Ling 3.0 Tiny medium | Inclusionai | 2.7 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 4.41s |
| #77 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 low | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.138 | 2/2 | 4.35s |
| #56 | Muse Spark 1.2 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.655 | 2/2 | 4.22s |