Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↓.
359/359
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #149 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.2 | $0.323 | 2/2 | 38.3s |
| #150 | Qwen3.7 Flash low | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.2 | $0.043 | 2/2 | 15.4s |
| #152 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.1 | $1.047 | 2/2 | 23.4s |
| #153 | Muse Glimmer 30B low | Meta | 10.0 | 7.1 | $0.152 | 2/2 | 4.17s |
| #155 | Solar Pro 4 high | Upstage | 10.0 | 7.1 | $0.138 | 2/2 | 62.5s |
| #156 | Mercury 2.5 high | Inception | 10.0 | 7.1 | $0.031 | 2/2 | 3.08s |
| #157 | Grok 4.3 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 7.0 | $0.741 | 2/2 | 19.0s |
| #158 | GPT-5.6 Sol none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.0 | $0.201 | 2/2 | 1.53s |
| #159 | GPT-6 Luna low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.0 | $0.020 | 2/2 | 9.94s |
| #160 | DeepSeek V3.2 medium | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 7.0 | $0.078 | 2/2 | 36.1s |
| #161 | GLM 5.1 medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 7.0 | $0.727 | 2/2 | 9.33s |
| #162 | GPT-5.5 none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.0 | $0.544 | 2/2 | 1.18s |
| #164 | Grok 4.20 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 7.0 | $0.805 | 2/2 | 4.17s |
| #165 | Seed-2.0-Mini medium | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 7.0 | $0.116 | 2/2 | 24.3s |
| #166 | Kimi K2.5 medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.0 | $0.479 | 2/2 | 49.8s |