Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
216/216
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #103 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.231 | 2/2 | 2.87s |
| #110 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low | 10.0 | 6.5 | $0.646 | 2/2 | 3.00s | |
| #118 | Claude Sonnet 5 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 6.3 | $0.548 | 2/2 | 3.01s |
| #140 | Mimo V2 Omni medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.9 | $0.683 | 2/2 | 3.04s |
| #34 | GPT-5.2 Chat none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.604 | 2/2 | 3.05s |
| #16 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.9 | $0.920 | 2/2 | 3.07s |
| #24 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.951 | 2/2 | 3.15s |
| #26 | Claude Sonnet 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.3 | $0.922 | 2/2 | 3.16s |
| #27 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.3 | $0.647 | 2/2 | 3.22s |
| #189 | Trinity Large Preview none | Arcee AI | 10.0 | 4.8 | $0.008 | 2/2 | 3.26s |
| #9 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $1.253 | 2/2 | 3.28s |
| #198 | Laguna M.1 none | Poolside | 10.0 | 4.4 | $0.009 | 2/2 | 3.37s |
| #67 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.3 | $0.661 | 2/2 | 3.43s |
| #23 | Grok 4.5 low | X AI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.935 | 2/2 | 3.44s |
| #150 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high | Kwaipilot | 6.5 | 5.6 | $0.077 | 1/2 | 3.59s |