AI BENCHY Category
Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Metric ↑.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #59 | Qwen3.5-Flash none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.2 | 2/2 | 1.57s |
| #60 | Gemma 4 26B A4B none | 10.0 | 6.2 | 2/2 | 1.70s | |
| #61 | Seed-2.0-Lite none | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 6.2 | 2/2 | 1.82s |
| #62 | Gemini 2.5 Flash none | 10.0 | 6.2 | 2/2 | 652ms | |
| #63 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | 2/2 | 1.16s |
| #65 | MiMo-V2-Pro none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 6.0 | 2/2 | 1.39s |
| #66 | GPT-5.4 none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 5.9 | 2/2 | 1.04s |
| #67 | Qwen3.5-27B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.9 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #69 | Kimi K2.6 none | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 5.8 | 2/2 | 1.32s |
| #70 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.7 | 2/2 | 1.01s |
| #72 | Hunter Alpha none | OpenRouter | 10.0 | 5.7 | 2/2 | 8.49s |
| #75 | GLM 5.1 none | Z.ai | 10.0 | 5.6 | 2/2 | 1.08s |
| #77 | GLM 5 Turbo none | Z.ai | 10.0 | 5.5 | 2/2 | 2.47s |
| #78 | Trinity Large Preview none | Arcee AI | 10.0 | 5.3 | 2/2 | 3.26s |
| #79 | Grok 4.20 Beta none | X AI | 10.0 | 5.3 | 2/2 | 601ms |