Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
216/216
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #214 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30b A3b Reasoning none | NVIDIA | 3.8 | 3.2 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 1.42s |
| #109 | Qwen3.5-27B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.5 | $0.090 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #75 | Qwen3.7 Plus none | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.2 | $0.106 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #111 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low | 10.0 | 6.5 | $0.621 | 2/2 | 1.44s | |
| #167 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.061 | 2/2 | 1.46s |
| #6 | Gemini 3.6 Flash low | 10.0 | 9.4 | $0.517 | 2/2 | 1.48s | |
| #200 | GLM 4.7 Flash medium | Z.ai | 6.3 | 4.3 | $0.166 | 1/2 | 1.51s |
| #87 | GPT-5.6 Sol none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 6.9 | $0.524 | 2/2 | 1.53s |
| #131 | Qwen3.5-Flash none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.073 | 2/2 | 1.57s |
| #92 | Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal | 10.0 | 6.8 | $0.300 | 2/2 | 1.66s | |
| #104 | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite medium | 10.0 | 6.5 | $0.369 | 2/2 | 1.69s | |
| #162 | Gemma 4 26B A4B none | 10.0 | 5.5 | $0.015 | 2/2 | 1.70s | |
| #163 | Mimo V2 Omni none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.5 | $0.021 | 2/2 | 1.76s |
| #70 | Claude Opus 4.8 none | Anthropic | 7.3 | 7.3 | $1.166 | 1/2 | 1.77s |
| #14 | Gemini 3.5 Flash low | 10.0 | 8.9 | $0.433 | 2/2 | 1.81s |