AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Category

Data parsing and extraction Ranking

See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.

Models Shown

15

Average Data parsing and extraction Score

8.7

Rank Model Company Data parsing and extraction Score Score Tests Correct Response Time (avg)
#68 Claude Opus 4.8 none Anthropic 7.3 7.0 1/2 1.77s
#3 Gemini 3.5 Flash low Google 10.0 9.4 2/2 1.81s
#110 Seed-2.0-Lite none Bytedance Seed 10.0 5.8 2/2 1.82s
#95 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Qwen 10.0 6.3 2/2 1.89s
#104 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550b A55b none NVIDIA 10.0 6.0 2/2 1.94s
#99 gpt-oss-120b medium OpenAI 6.4 6.1 1/2 1.98s
#118 Qwen3.6 27B none Qwen 7.3 5.6 1/2 2.06s
#128 Qwen3.6 Flash none Qwen 10.0 5.4 2/2 2.13s
#8 Claude Opus 4.7 none Anthropic 10.0 8.9 2/2 2.15s
#63 GPT-5.3 Chat none OpenAI 10.0 7.2 2/2 2.21s
#85 Gemma 4 31B none Google 10.0 6.5 2/2 2.25s
#57 Step 3.7 Flash low Stepfun 7.3 7.3 1/2 2.29s
#40 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Google 10.0 7.5 2/2 2.29s
#11 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Anthropic 10.0 8.7 2/2 2.37s
#45 GPT-5.4 Mini medium OpenAI 10.0 7.5 2/2 2.43s

Top Models by Data parsing and extraction Score

Data parsing and extraction Score vs Total Cost

Top Models by Response Time (avg)