Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
343/343
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #228 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.9 | $0.151 | 2/2 | 1.16s |
| #152 | GPT-5.5 none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.0 | $0.544 | 2/2 | 1.18s |
| #192 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.052 | 2/2 | 1.22s | |
| #281 | Mistral Small 4 medium | Mistral | 7.3 | 5.1 | $0.097 | 1/2 | 1.23s |
| #241 | Inkling Small low | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.055 | 2/2 | 1.25s |
| #293 | GPT-4o-mini none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 5.0 | $0.010 | 2/2 | 1.27s |
| #234 | GPT-5.4 Mini none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 5.9 | $0.095 | 2/2 | 1.30s |
| #283 | Qwen3 Coder Next none | Qwen | 6.5 | 5.1 | $0.026 | 1/2 | 1.32s |
| #266 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.4 | $0.068 | 2/2 | 1.32s |
| #244 | Kimi K2.6 none | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.233 | 2/2 | 1.32s |
| #121 | Qwen3.7 Max none | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.197 | 2/2 | 1.35s |
| #273 | Ling-2.6-1T none | Inclusionai | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.016 | 2/2 | 1.37s |
| #13 | GPT-5.6 Sol medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.4 | $0.508 | 2/2 | 1.38s |
| #251 | Mimo V2 PRO none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.6 | $0.045 | 2/2 | 1.39s |
| #282 | Granite 4.2 8B low | IBM Granite | 6.5 | 5.1 | $0.012 | 1/2 | 1.39s |