Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↑.
359/359
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #281 | Inkling Small none | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.054 | 2/2 | 782ms |
| #282 | Laguna XS 2.1 none | Poolside | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.008 | 2/2 | 768ms |
| #283 | Seed-2.0-Code none | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.151 | 2/2 | 4.53s |
| #284 | Ling-2.6-1T none | Inclusionai | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.016 | 2/2 | 1.37s |
| #285 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 10.0 | 5.3 | $2.310 | 2/2 | 7.16s | |
| #286 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.061 | 2/2 | 1.46s |
| #287 | Dots 3 Note Preview none | Dots Studio | 10.0 | 5.2 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 2.72s |
| #288 | Inkling none | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 5.2 | $0.147 | 2/2 | 1.14s |
| #291 | Mistral Small 4 none | Mistral | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.022 | 2/2 | 822ms |
| #297 | Qwen3.5-9B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.021 | 2/2 | 847ms |
| #298 | GLM 5 Turbo none | Z.ai | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.047 | 2/2 | 2.47s |
| #299 | North Mini Code none | Cohere | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 28.0s |
| #302 | Laguna S 2.1 low | Poolside | 10.0 | 5.0 | $0.082 | 2/2 | 2.76s |
| #304 | GPT-4o-mini none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 5.0 | $0.010 | 2/2 | 1.27s |
| #305 | Qwen3.6 Plus Preview medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 4.9 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 14.9s |