Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↑.
359/359
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #215 | Seed-2.0-Lite none | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.066 | 2/2 | 1.82s |
| #216 | Gemma 4 31B medium | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.100 | 2/2 | 21.1s | |
| #217 | GPT-5.6 Luna low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.051 | 2/2 | 2.14s |
| #218 | Claude Sonnet 5 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.548 | 2/2 | 3.01s |
| #219 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.047 | 2/2 | 1.04s | |
| #222 | Qwen3.7 Flash none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.019 | 2/2 | 2.09s |
| #223 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.046 | 2/2 | 843ms | |
| #225 | Inkling low | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.187 | 2/2 | 2.07s |
| #227 | Qwen3.6 Flash none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.062 | 2/2 | 2.13s |
| #228 | Gemma 4 31B none | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.016 | 2/2 | 2.25s | |
| #229 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.122 | 2/2 | 2.82s |
| #230 | Nemotron 3 Ultra none | NVIDIA | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.084 | 2/2 | 1.94s |
| #232 | Gemini 2.5 Flash none | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.017 | 2/2 | 652ms | |
| #233 | Grok 4.20 Beta medium | X AI | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.750 | 2/2 | 4.01s |
| #234 | GPT-5.6 Terra none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.280 | 2/2 | 1.13s |