Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↑.
311/311
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #45 | Grok 4.6 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.713 | 2/2 | 11.5s |
| #228 | Hy4 preview low | Tencent | 8.7 | 5.6 | $1.745 | 1/2 | 88.5s |
| #36 | Muse Spark 1.2 high | Meta | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.771 | 2/2 | 6.93s |
| #27 | Seed 2.1 Turbo high | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 8.9 | $1.797 | 2/2 | 33.7s |
| #12 | Grok 4.6 high | X AI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $1.908 | 2/2 | 16.1s |
| #49 | Seed 2.1 Turbo medium | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.951 | 2/2 | 37.8s |
| #31 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 7.1 | 8.8 | $1.983 | 1/2 | 12.3s |
| #7 | Gemini 3.5 Flash high | 10.0 | 9.4 | $2.011 | 2/2 | 6.43s | |
| #43 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.5 | $2.042 | 2/2 | 6.29s |
| #219 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite high | 10.0 | 5.6 | $2.044 | 2/2 | 4.49s | |
| #78 | Claude Opus 4.8 low | Anthropic | 6.3 | 7.8 | $2.089 | 1/2 | 2.27s |
| #75 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.8 | $2.126 | 2/2 | 13.9s |
| #24 | Grok 4.5 high | X AI | 10.0 | 9.0 | $2.252 | 2/2 | 7.63s |
| #60 | Muse Spark 1.1 high | Meta | 10.0 | 8.0 | $2.253 | 2/2 | 8.40s |
| #245 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 10.0 | 5.3 | $2.310 | 2/2 | 7.16s |