Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↑.
311/311
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #141 | Step 3.7 Flash high | Stepfun | 10.0 | 6.8 | $1.229 | 2/2 | 14.7s |
| #116 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.2 | $1.247 | 2/2 | 20.4s |
| #11 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $1.257 | 2/2 | 3.28s |
| #138 | Seed-2.0-Code high | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 6.9 | $1.273 | 2/2 | 24.3s |
| #37 | Muse Spark 1.2 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.339 | 2/2 | 6.42s |
| #13 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 10.0 | 9.2 | $1.352 | 2/2 | 7.72s | |
| #38 | Muse Spark 1.1 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.420 | 2/2 | 4.96s |
| #29 | Muse Spark 1.3 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.8 | $1.469 | 2/2 | 8.75s |
| #35 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.476 | 2/2 | 2.37s |
| #18 | Seed 2.1 Turbo low | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 9.1 | $1.546 | 2/2 | 34.5s |
| #89 | Claude Opus 5 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.5 | $1.550 | 2/2 | 3.88s |
| #42 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.5 | $1.560 | 2/2 | 5.32s |
| #16 | Claude Opus 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 9.2 | $1.586 | 2/2 | 3.92s |
| #2 | Gemini 3.8 Flash high | 10.0 | 9.9 | $1.595 | 2/2 | 8.23s | |
| #26 | Muse Spark 1.3 high | Meta | 10.0 | 8.9 | $1.653 | 2/2 | 7.01s |