Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
311/311
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #105 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.4 | $2.357 | 2/2 | 13.7s |
| #75 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.8 | $2.126 | 2/2 | 13.9s |
| #272 | Trinity Large Thinking high | Arcee AI | 6.3 | 4.8 | $0.592 | 1/2 | 14.0s |
| #227 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning high | NVIDIA | 7.3 | 5.6 | $0.134 | 1/2 | 14.0s |
| #194 | Trinity Large Thinking low | Arcee AI | 7.3 | 6.0 | $0.625 | 1/2 | 14.3s |
| #141 | Step 3.7 Flash high | Stepfun | 10.0 | 6.8 | $1.229 | 2/2 | 14.7s |
| #118 | Muse Glimmer 30B high | Meta | 7.3 | 7.2 | $0.430 | 1/2 | 14.9s |
| #92 | MiniMax M3 medium | Minimax | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.300 | 2/2 | 14.9s |
| #71 | Qwen3.6 Plus medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.418 | 2/2 | 14.9s |
| #264 | Qwen3.6 Plus Preview medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 4.9 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 14.9s |
| #202 | Step 3.5 Flash medium | Stepfun | 10.0 | 5.9 | $0.132 | 2/2 | 15.0s |
| #137 | Qwen3.7 Flash medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.9 | $0.065 | 2/2 | 15.4s |
| #120 | Qwen3.7 Flash low | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.2 | $0.043 | 2/2 | 15.4s |
| #12 | Grok 4.6 high | X AI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $1.908 | 2/2 | 16.1s |
| #189 | Trinity Large Thinking medium | Arcee AI | 6.3 | 6.1 | $0.756 | 1/2 | 16.4s |