Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Metric ↑.
311/311
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #182 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.047 | 2/2 | 1.04s | |
| #185 | Qwen3.7 Flash none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.019 | 2/2 | 2.09s |
| #186 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.046 | 2/2 | 843ms | |
| #188 | Inkling low | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.187 | 2/2 | 2.07s |
| #190 | Qwen3.6 Flash none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.062 | 2/2 | 2.13s |
| #191 | Gemma 4 31B none | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.016 | 2/2 | 2.25s | |
| #192 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.122 | 2/2 | 2.82s |
| #193 | Nemotron 3 Ultra none | NVIDIA | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.084 | 2/2 | 1.94s |
| #195 | Gemini 2.5 Flash none | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.017 | 2/2 | 652ms | |
| #196 | Grok 4.20 Beta medium | X AI | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.750 | 2/2 | 4.01s |
| #197 | GPT-5.6 Terra none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.280 | 2/2 | 1.13s |
| #198 | Gemini 3 PRO Preview medium | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.385 | 2/2 | 10.8s | |
| #200 | Qwen3.5-Flash none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.073 | 2/2 | 1.57s |
| #201 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.9 | $0.142 | 2/2 | 1.16s |
| #204 | Mimo V2 Omni medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.9 | $0.683 | 2/2 | 3.04s |