Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
311/311
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #104 | LongCat 2.0 medium | Meituan | 6.3 | 7.4 | $0.499 | 1/2 | 10.6s |
| #98 | Grok Build 0.1 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 7.5 | $1.130 | 2/2 | 10.7s |
| #152 | LongCat 2.0 low | Meituan | 6.3 | 6.7 | $0.412 | 1/2 | 10.8s |
| #198 | Gemini 3 PRO Preview medium | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.385 | 2/2 | 10.8s | |
| #155 | LongCat 2.0 high | Meituan | 3.6 | 6.7 | $0.492 | 0/2 | 11.0s |
| #45 | Grok 4.6 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.713 | 2/2 | 11.5s |
| #170 | Dots 3 Note Preview low | Dots Studio | 7.3 | 6.4 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 11.5s |
| #106 | Grok 4.6 low | X AI | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.449 | 2/2 | 11.6s |
| #205 | Hy3 preview high | Tencent | 6.5 | 5.9 | $0.135 | 1/2 | 12.1s |
| #102 | Kimi K2.7 Code medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.687 | 2/2 | 12.3s |
| #31 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 7.1 | 8.8 | $1.983 | 1/2 | 12.3s |
| #57 | GPT-5 Mini medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.1 | $0.241 | 2/2 | 12.6s |
| #171 | Dots 3 Note Preview high | Dots Studio | 7.3 | 6.4 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 12.7s |
| #162 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.672 | 2/2 | 13.0s |
| #73 | GLM 5.2 medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.224 | 2/2 | 13.4s |