Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Metric ↑.
330/330
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #111 | Grok Build 0.1 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 7.5 | $1.130 | 2/2 | 10.7s |
| #112 | Gemini 3.8 Flash low | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.239 | 2/2 | 2.34s | |
| #113 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.117 | 2/2 | 2.29s | |
| #114 | Qwen3.7 Max none | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.197 | 2/2 | 1.35s |
| #115 | Kimi K2.7 Code medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.655 | 2/2 | 12.3s |
| #116 | GPT-5.6 Luna medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.072 | 2/2 | 1.95s |
| #118 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.4 | $2.357 | 2/2 | 13.7s |
| #119 | Grok 4.6 low | X AI | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.449 | 2/2 | 11.6s |
| #120 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview low | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.185 | 2/2 | 9.40s | |
| #121 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.3 | $0.661 | 2/2 | 3.43s |
| #122 | GLM 5.3 high | Z.ai | 10.0 | 7.3 | $0.403 | 2/2 | 3.55s |
| #123 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 low | Kwaipilot | 10.0 | 7.3 | $0.400 | 2/2 | 4.19s |
| #125 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite medium | 10.0 | 7.3 | $0.120 | 2/2 | 2.60s | |
| #126 | Qwen3.7 Plus none | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.3 | $0.106 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #127 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 medium | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 7.3 | $0.046 | 2/2 | 5.21s |