Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
216/216
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #100 | Gemma 4 26B A4B medium | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.089 | 2/2 | 16.5s | |
| #37 | Kimi K3 max | Moonshot AI | 7.3 | 8.0 | $3.112 | 1/2 | 16.7s |
| #115 | Mimo V2 PRO medium | Xiaomi | 7.3 | 6.3 | $0.333 | 1/2 | 17.2s |
| #194 | Cobuddy medium | Baidu | 6.3 | 4.7 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 17.4s |
| #146 | Nemotron 3 Super medium | NVIDIA | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.055 | 2/2 | 18.2s |
| #88 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 7.3 | 6.9 | $0.187 | 1/2 | 18.8s |
| #77 | Grok 4.3 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 7.1 | $0.779 | 2/2 | 19.0s |
| #206 | MiMo-V2-Flash none | Xiaomi | 2.9 | 4.0 | $0.025 | 0/2 | 19.7s |
| #72 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.2 | $1.036 | 2/2 | 20.4s |
| #116 | Gemma 4 31B medium | 10.0 | 6.3 | $0.107 | 2/2 | 21.1s | |
| #134 | GPT-5 Nano medium | OpenAI | 3.7 | 6.1 | $0.114 | 0/2 | 21.4s |
| #152 | Owl Alpha medium | Openrouter | 10.0 | 5.6 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 21.6s |
| #40 | Qwen3.7 Plus medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.9 | $0.267 | 2/2 | 21.7s |
| #178 | MiniMax M2.7 medium | Minimax | 6.3 | 5.0 | $0.163 | 1/2 | 21.9s |
| #190 | Hunter Alpha medium | OpenRouter | 10.0 | 4.7 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 23.2s |