Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↑.
216/216
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #24 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.951 | 2/2 | 3.15s |
| #5 | GPT-5.6 Sol low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.5 | $0.971 | 2/2 | 1.82s |
| #32 | Inkling high | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 8.0 | $1.006 | 2/2 | 8.19s |
| #48 | GPT-5.6 Luna high | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.7 | $1.017 | 2/2 | 2.18s |
| #72 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.2 | $1.036 | 2/2 | 20.4s |
| #76 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.1 | $1.046 | 2/2 | 23.4s |
| #38 | GPT-5.6 Terra high | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.0 | $1.055 | 2/2 | 938ms |
| #83 | Gemini 3.5 Flash none | 6.5 | 7.0 | $1.079 | 1/2 | 8.10s | |
| #52 | Grok Build 0.1 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 7.6 | $1.097 | 2/2 | 10.7s |
| #11 | Qwen3.7 Max medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 9.2 | $1.116 | 2/2 | 8.80s |
| #22 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.143 | 2/2 | 41.2s |
| #70 | Claude Opus 4.8 none | Anthropic | 7.3 | 7.3 | $1.166 | 1/2 | 1.77s |
| #90 | Step 3.7 Flash high | Stepfun | 10.0 | 6.9 | $1.207 | 2/2 | 14.7s |
| #8 | GPT-5.6 Sol high | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.4 | $1.234 | 2/2 | 1.16s |
| #9 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $1.253 | 2/2 | 3.28s |