Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↑.
216/216
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #109 | Qwen3.5-27B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.5 | $0.090 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #110 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low | 10.0 | 6.5 | $0.646 | 2/2 | 3.00s | |
| #111 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low | 10.0 | 6.5 | $0.621 | 2/2 | 1.44s | |
| #112 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.052 | 2/2 | 1.22s | |
| #113 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.073 | 2/2 | 1.89s |
| #116 | Gemma 4 31B medium | 10.0 | 6.3 | $0.107 | 2/2 | 21.1s | |
| #117 | LongCat 2.0 none | Meituan | 10.0 | 6.3 | $0.044 | 2/2 | 2.36s |
| #118 | Claude Sonnet 5 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 6.3 | $0.548 | 2/2 | 3.01s |
| #121 | Gemma 4 31B none | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.021 | 2/2 | 2.25s | |
| #122 | Seed-2.0-Lite none | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.066 | 2/2 | 1.82s |
| #123 | GPT-5.6 Luna low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.249 | 2/2 | 2.14s |
| #124 | Gemini 2.5 Flash none | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.017 | 2/2 | 652ms | |
| #126 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.047 | 2/2 | 1.04s | |
| #128 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.046 | 2/2 | 843ms | |
| #129 | Inkling low | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.187 | 2/2 | 2.07s |