Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
343/343
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #129 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.3 | $0.661 | 2/2 | 3.43s |
| #58 | Grok 4.5 low | X AI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.945 | 2/2 | 3.44s |
| #130 | GLM 5.3 high | Z.ai | 10.0 | 7.3 | $0.262 | 2/2 | 3.55s |
| #247 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high | Kwaipilot | 6.5 | 5.6 | $0.077 | 1/2 | 3.59s |
| #252 | Owl Alpha none | Openrouter | 10.0 | 5.6 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 3.60s |
| #80 | Inkling medium | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.383 | 2/2 | 3.60s |
| #69 | Muse Spark 1.3 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.2 | $0.689 | 2/2 | 3.62s |
| #78 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 high | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.279 | 2/2 | 3.65s |
| #253 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 medium | Kwaipilot | 6.5 | 5.6 | $0.048 | 1/2 | 3.65s |
| #41 | Claude Opus 5 low | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.121 | 2/2 | 3.69s |
| #54 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash medium | DeepSeek | 6.5 | 8.5 | $0.272 | 1/2 | 3.77s |
| #52 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash low | DeepSeek | 6.5 | 8.5 | $0.224 | 1/2 | 3.80s |
| #248 | GLM 5V Turbo none | Z.ai | 10.0 | 5.6 | $0.052 | 2/2 | 3.81s |
| #107 | Claude Opus 5 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.5 | $1.550 | 2/2 | 3.88s |
| #21 | Claude Opus 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 9.2 | $1.586 | 2/2 | 3.92s |