Coding Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Coding, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear.
408/408
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Coding Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #179 | Claude Opus 4.8 none | Anthropic | 0.5 | 0.7 | $2.334 | 1/3 | 3.29s |
| #184 | GPT-6 Sol none | OpenAI | 0.5 | 0.7 | $0.551 | 1/3 | 12.2s |
| #189 | Qwen3.5-Flash none | Qwen | 0.5 | 0.7 | $0.089 | 1/3 | 850ms |
| #195 | GPT-5.6 Sol none | OpenAI | 0.5 | 0.7 | $0.795 | 1/3 | 1.39s |
| #198 | GPT-5.5 none | OpenAI | 0.5 | 0.7 | $1.212 | 1/3 | 1.35s |
| #213 | Laguna XS 2.1 medium | Poolside | 0.5 | 0.6 | $0.083 | 1/3 | 70.3s |
| #215 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview none | 0.5 | 0.6 | $0.155 | 1/3 | 1.80s | |
| #224 | LongCat 2.0 none | Meituan | 0.5 | 0.6 | $0.104 | 1/3 | 2.85s |
| #226 | Qwen3.6 27B none | Qwen | 0.5 | 0.6 | $0.148 | 1/3 | 4.16s |
| #228 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low | 0.5 | 0.6 | $0.736 | 1/3 | 1.39s | |
| #229 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low | 0.5 | 0.6 | $0.717 | 1/3 | 1.53s | |
| #243 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none | 0.5 | 0.6 | $0.090 | 1/3 | 967ms | |
| #251 | Granite 4.2 8B medium | IBM Granite | 0.5 | 0.6 | $0.029 | 1/3 | 12.1s |
| #254 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 none | Anthropic | 0.5 | 0.6 | $0.661 | 1/3 | 5.19s |
| #259 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal | 0.5 | 0.6 | $0.080 | 1/3 | 831ms |