AI BENCHY Category
Coding Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Coding, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↑.
188/188
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Coding Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #156 | Trinity Large Preview none | Arcee AI | 3.7 | 5.0 | $0.008 | 0/3 | 14.3s |
| #167 | Qwen3 Coder Next medium | Qwen | 3.7 | 4.7 | $0.008 | 0/3 | 924ms |
| #149 | Qwen3 Coder Next none | Qwen | 4.6 | 5.1 | $0.009 | 0/3 | 2.22s |
| #169 | Laguna M.1 none | Poolside | 2.5 | 4.6 | $0.009 | 0/1 | 2.93s |
| #183 | gpt-oss-120b none | OpenAI | 1.5 | 4.0 | $0.010 | 0/1 | 9.57s |
| #164 | GPT-5.4 Nano none | OpenAI | 4.6 | 4.8 | $0.011 | 0/3 | 2.22s |
| #170 | Mercury 2 none | Inception | 3.4 | 4.6 | $0.011 | 0/3 | 1.03s |
| #119 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none | Qwen | 5.5 | 5.9 | $0.012 | 1/3 | 1.39s |
| #91 | gpt-oss-120b medium | OpenAI | 5.9 | 6.7 | $0.013 | 1/3 | 38.4s |
| #111 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none | 5.5 | 6.1 | $0.013 | 1/3 | 938ms | |
| #109 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal | 5.5 | 6.1 | $0.013 | 1/3 | 831ms | |
| #118 | Qwen3.6 Flash none | Qwen | 5.4 | 6.0 | $0.015 | 1/3 | 1.79s |
| #120 | Qwen3.5-27B none | Qwen | 5.8 | 5.9 | $0.015 | 1/3 | 1.80s |
| #99 | Hy3 preview low | Tencent | 5.3 | 6.4 | $0.015 | 1/3 | 27.9s |
| #175 | Laguna Xs.2 medium | Poolside | 2.1 | 4.3 | $0.015 | 0/1 | 14.4s |