Coding Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Coding, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↑.
289/289
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Coding Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #23 | Seed 2.1 Turbo high | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 8.9 | $1.797 | 3/3 | 336.0s |
| #11 | Grok 4.6 high | X AI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $1.908 | 3/3 | 102.2s |
| #43 | Seed 2.1 Turbo medium | Bytedance Seed | 8.2 | 8.4 | $1.951 | 2/3 | 354.9s |
| #26 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.8 | $1.983 | 3/3 | 15.3s |
| #6 | Gemini 3.5 Flash high | 10.0 | 9.4 | $2.011 | 3/3 | 23.0s | |
| #37 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 7.6 | 8.5 | $2.042 | 2/3 | 155.7s |
| #205 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite high | 3.3 | 5.6 | $2.044 | 1/1 | 137.6s | |
| #70 | Claude Opus 4.8 low | Anthropic | 6.6 | 7.8 | $2.089 | 1/3 | 7.58s |
| #67 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 5.7 | 7.8 | $2.126 | 1/3 | 33.3s |
| #21 | Grok 4.5 high | X AI | 10.0 | 9.0 | $2.252 | 3/3 | 155.2s |
| #230 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 0.0 | 5.3 | $2.310 | 0/0 | 0ms | |
| #95 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high | Qwen | 5.9 | 7.4 | $2.357 | 1/3 | 160.5s |
| #48 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B low | Qwen | 7.8 | 8.1 | $2.672 | 2/3 | 172.5s |
| #74 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 5.7 | 7.7 | $2.961 | 1/3 | 30.1s |
| #33 | Claude Fable 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.6 | $3.004 | 3/3 | 15.6s |