Coding Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Coding, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
289/289
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Coding Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #111 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium | Qwen | 6.0 | 7.1 | $1.047 | 1/3 | 114.5s |
| #39 | Grok 4.6 medium | X AI | 8.2 | 8.4 | $1.713 | 2/3 | 120.0s |
| #108 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 medium | Qwen | 6.2 | 7.2 | $0.323 | 1/3 | 125.3s |
| #205 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite high | 3.3 | 5.6 | $2.044 | 1/1 | 137.6s | |
| #61 | Qwen3.8 27B low | Qwen | 7.7 | 7.9 | ~$0.071 | 2/3 | 140.9s |
| #152 | Qwen3.6 27B medium | Qwen | 7.7 | 6.5 | $1.045 | 2/3 | 143.0s |
| #249 | Ring-2.6-1T none | Inclusionai | 5.3 | 4.8 | $0.026 | 1/3 | 143.8s |
| #84 | MiniMax M3 medium | Minimax | 6.1 | 7.5 | $0.300 | 1/3 | 144.7s |
| #34 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium | Qwen | 8.8 | 8.6 | $1.132 | 2/3 | 146.5s |
| #92 | Kimi K2.7 Code medium | Moonshot AI | 7.8 | 7.4 | $0.709 | 2/3 | 146.7s |
| #198 | Nemotron 3 Super medium | NVIDIA | 3.1 | 5.7 | $0.050 | 0/3 | 147.3s |
| #51 | Inkling high | Thinkingmachines | 8.5 | 8.0 | $1.041 | 2/3 | 148.4s |
| #63 | Qwen3.6 Plus medium | Qwen | 6.1 | 7.8 | $0.418 | 1/3 | 153.1s |
| #21 | Grok 4.5 high | X AI | 10.0 | 9.0 | $2.252 | 3/3 | 155.2s |
| #37 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 7.6 | 8.5 | $2.042 | 2/3 | 155.7s |